FANDOM


  • Heyo heyo! I've had some ideas for this wiki ever since I stepped foot on it and I'd like to share them with you all to hear your thoughts. If the majority decides to go for it, this new theme will replace the current one.

    Previews are available for:

    If you have a page you want to see in this theme, feel free to create it at one of my subpages or else it won't work!

    Subpage creation tutorial  

    For example, if you want to see Wigfrid's page in this theme, first go to Wigfrid and then view the raw version. You can do this for any page by adding ?action=raw to the page's url.

    Then just go to User:Robyn Grayson/Wigfrid, paste the stuff you copied from the raw page and add a couple lines. Them being:

    {{DISPLAYTITLE:{{SUBPAGENAME}}}}
    

    And a name parameter for the infobox:

    |name = {{SUBPAGENAME}}

    Once that's done, hit that save button!


    With all that said, I'm aware change may sometimes be hard, so of course, I'm open to suggestions.

      Loading editor
    • its a bit too transparent just to show a background maybe i'm just used to white

        Loading editor
    • Overall it looks good, but I've noticed some problems.

      Text of Captions of the Gallery, name in Recent Wiki Activity and names in Popular Page are difficult to read.

      The background of Sound, Categories and Craftable Items are the wrong colors.

      The frames of the selected infobox and tabber do not detach from the background. That's too bad because I like their style.

      Like Wolf, I think it's a bit too transparent, which makes the background too present.

        Loading editor
    • Overall, it's excessivly transparent. Really excessively. In general, I'm not in favour of integrating the background into the article body - text should be presented with as little variation as possible in the background to ensure readability (ignoring the font colour in the previews, I assume it will be changed to something with more contrast), and the best way to achieve this? A consistant article body, with a constant contrast.

      This is impossible to achieve with any background other than a plain, boring solid colour. I would very much rather just stick to the current background.

      As for the colour palette, well, it looks quite nice, but it's a bit distracting. Bright cyan doesn't really fit all that well without sticking out too much, once again I'm in favour of just sticking to the current style.

      The one thing I like however is the infobox design. If a solid background that matches the wiki's current palette can be provided, I'm more than happy with using it. Just needs making sure the infobox background fits nicely with the rest of the theme, is opaque, and doesn't contain too much detail to ensure readability. The tabbers also could use a defining border to make them easier to see. Unless you're paying attention, you may not notice that there is a tabber at all right now.

      Well, I've been quite negative and opposing here, haven't I...? Can't help it, I'm not happy with this and wouldn't want our readers to have to deal with the problems listed above (including Wolf and Cuikui's replies), especially those with sight issues.

      That aside, I'm glad this is being discussed on a wider scale now. Even if only the infoboxes change, this is a major change with a large impact.

      - Deiaa (Wall)

        Loading editor
    • I agree with Deiaa on all points really. I do want to say as well that I love the infobox look! How the title uses the game font, and how the DST symbol appears on the DST tabber when you click on it! Very cool.

        Loading editor
    • Deiaa2002 wrote:

      Well, I've been quite negative and opposing here, haven't I...?

      - Deiaa (Wall)

      I don't see how. You've simply stated a good opinion across three different points. Don't try to draw negativity out of nothing.

        Loading editor
    • Ngl, the text color is a little hard to see, but overall i like the design!

        Loading editor
    • I like it, but I think the text color should be brighter, its hard to see it.

        Loading editor
    • The theme is lovely, however one main problem sticks out (which has been mentioned before) - it's simply too transparent. With the settings my computer are on at the moment, reading the text is near impossible. I suggest either lowering the transparency or using a background that does not merge with the text colors. Essentially, I agree with Bluegeist and Deiaa2002 with this matter.

        Loading editor
    • I'm unable to read... I'm kind of dalonic so maybe that... either way, I would prefer it to be brighter colors instead.

        Loading editor
    • Honestly I really dislike the infoboxes, they feel a bit too extra, while the current infoboxes are really simple. This new infoxbox also looks really silly for characters.

      Willow willow

      There's the obvious thing of Willow's name being there twice in the same font, but the border of the infobox and the border of the portrait are also the same which leads to this really unpleasing effect.

        Loading editor
    • Cuikui wrote:
      Overall it looks good, but I've noticed some problems.

      Text of Captions of the Gallery, name in Recent Wiki Activity and names in Popular Page are difficult to read.

      The background of Sound, Categories and Craftable Items are the wrong colors.

      The frames of the selected infobox and tabber do not detach from the background. That's too bad because I like their style.

      Like Wolf, I think it's a bit too transparent, which makes the background too present.

      The theme I have there is just a beta, since it takes awhile to actually style everything, it's mainly just a feel to see if that background + link color looks "good". Sorry for the confusion but I can fix those later.

      As I said, this isn't final, however, I will edit accordingly and get a preview up soon!

        Loading editor
    • Aesthetically speaking, it looks really awesome. I particularly enjoy the infobox design and the theme. It brings up some spooky but refreshing vibe to the wiki.

      However, the main purpose of the wiki is to provide information to players who are usually in desperate for answers. As a result, readability is always a priority. My opinion is that words need to be very clear and background should never affect the clarity of words as well. Moreover, the design of the collapsible content box might require further fixing, since it's a bit absurd with the overall design.

      Keep it up man. As long as you fix those problems which are mentioned by my fellow admins, I believe there is a reasonable chance to implement your design.

      For the purpose of site-wide implementation: Symbol weak support vote.png Weakly support
      For the purpose of design and my opinion: Symbol support vote.png Support

      - ♞ Mentalis†PRO (Glommer.pngwall) 11:45, March 9, 2020 (UTC)

        Loading editor
    • I just realized I forgot to put a new line in the code that messed up the colors, that should be fixed now.

        Loading editor
    • I'm used to the current looks, but God, the new one looks great in my opinion.

        Loading editor
    • As others have stated before, the nonreadability caused by the excessive transparency is a huge issue. That would be a deal-breaker for me. I'm also not a fan of how the subject of the image is hidden behind the body of the article while the more visible sides (which is arguably what a background image should primarily be used for) are basically empty. The cyan link color certainly fits Fandom's design, but I don't really see any connection to Don't Starve's aesthetic.

      Overall, I really don't see a reason to change the wiki's design again so quickly, I'd be in favor of keeping the recent design. It took a lot of work and effort to finalize and I've grown rather attached to it.

      However, the suggested infobox design looks very nice in my opinion. As Deiaa said, a solid background color would be preferable to ensure readability. Also, we should maybe look into reducing the amount of displayed information so they don't become too long if we should choose to use this design.

      - MMueck

        Loading editor
    • Personally, I think current version fits with game more

      New one just looks like wendy weeb's background choice

      Wendy isn't as imortant like maxwell, right?

        Loading editor
    • or if possible, we could consider of allowing users to pick their personalised style, or the site updates the style based on specific time period, e.g. halloween

      - ♞ Mentalis†PRO (Glommer.pngwall)

        Loading editor
    • I can't see everything right with the new format. If that could be fixed, I do like it!

        Loading editor
    • White text on dark background - instantly bad no matter what other good features it might have. Please don't turn Don't Starve Wiki into yet another wiki which is only readable in No styles mode.

        Loading editor
    • Also, infobox is very huge and can't even fit on average laptop screen. Not everyone got a large screen to justify wasting screen space on "cool" big borders.

        Loading editor
    • Some input from a user on the Russian wiki:

      От OHSHIET:
      I was about to suggest something like changing links color in the infoboxes, because they didn't look great, it was a day or two ago, but then you just changed the whole page design with the links.

      Well, maybe try changing opacity? Set higher values, so the infobox stands out more from the usual text. Also I don't think that rotated "DST" icon really looks great. Don't know where to place it so that it looks better, but right now isn't the best option too.

      Tabbers

      And we have "image" tabbers with DS and DST icons (not only them, they're changeable, of course) which you can css change as you like (see image), because they're more flexible than the usual tabbers, but you can place this tabber only once on a page (if "starter" tab is "DS", you click on "DST", scroll down and see this kind of tabbers again, the next kind of tabbers will be clicked too, because you clicked earlier on "DST" and didn't switch back to "DS". So you can still use more than one this kind of tabber on a page, but that's not convenient). These tabbers are not like usual tabbers, but they're pretty interesting. Don't know, though, if this is going to work well with the infoboxes. Probably not the best option, but you can try these tabbers, if you're interested. These tabbers aren't our invention, but one of our friends took his part in developing them.

        Loading editor
    • I like it a lot, although I agree with the statement that the way they label the character name twice does look silly. Also, I think it would be cool if they made background images on the page for characters more specific to said character.

        Loading editor
    • The repeat naming isn't knew, it was always something the infobox had. It's just the bigger lettering made it more obvious.

        Loading editor
    • Would should be considered is mobile i know tablets and phones both seem to be different with phones being more simple and compact and well tablets being basically a crappy desktop view with more difficult editing so MORE CODING YAY but anyways the appearance on other devices should be considered

        Loading editor
    • Actually, isnt that repeat naming just the character name in the image itself? All dst character portraits have the curly border and the ds font, so it does look redundant, but it only applies to like 16 pages.

        Loading editor
    • Also, I'm pretty sure it's possible to modify character infoboxes to omit the title if necessary. Though, that raises the question: what about pages such as Woodie/Cursed? They still use character infoboxes, but they actually need that title.

      I'm in favour of just accepting the redundancy. It keeps things consistent and the redundancy only applies to a few pages, out of over 1,000 others.

      - Deiaa (Wall)

        Loading editor
    • If we don't want a title, just leave "|name = " blank.

        Loading editor
    • Pardon the delay but I'm having issues with my wifi so it'll be a bit before the update goes up.

        Loading editor
    • Robyn Grayson wrote:
      Pardon the delay but I'm having issues with my wifi so it'll be a bit before the update goes up.

      Just to clarify, are you referring to the preview or the implementation of the theme? I believe you're referring to the preview, as I don't think this is ready for implementation at all right now.

      - Deiaa (Wall)

        Loading editor
    • An anonymous contributor
        Loading editor
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.